An Interview with Greg Dawson - Page 3


 

Special Thanks to Mike Kraus who assisted with the questions for the original interview.

There are a couple of students from Princeton University who are floating the idea of holding a World's Fair in New York in 2012. A number of us have been contacted and asked to contribute to an online petition they are circulating that they hope to present to NY officials when they request that NY host a fourth World's Fair.

Since you were involved in the last Fair and were intimately involved in selling the Fair to the public, what advice would you give them, from your unique perspective, for selling the Fair to New York? - Bill Young

GREG DAWSON: I hesitate to put a damper on enthusiasm by anyone interested in creating a World's Fair since my own experience with the '64 Fair was enormously interesting and fulfilling. But a great deal has happened in the world over the almost 40 years since that Fair and the likelihood of a World's Fair anywhere in the US, let alone New York City, seems to me to be incredibly remote.

World's Fairs have traditionally been punctuations marks in history, usually highlighting great achievements of the past and heralding wonders yet to come or introducing wonders just born. But that was in eras when progress didn't move all that fast, when if you conceived a Fair and finally opened it three to four years later, nothing much changed. Today change happens in nanoseconds. Whatever you might plan for an exhibit today will be history by the time a Fair would open.

Then too, what is the need for a Fair? We have giant amusement parks like the Disney products which seem in their way far more glorious than any Fair I can imagine. [They are] filled with rides, with exhibits by corporations, with multi-national year-long festivals. We have generations of kids that have grown up during the past 40 years exposed to ever greater multimedia and motion picture special effects, effects that really couldn't be duplicated at a World's Fair and would thus make exhibits look boring and drab in comparison.

And most of all we have the tradition that all American-created World's Fairs have lost considerable sums of money so that any kind of fund raising effort to launch a Fair would be dubious at best. The $35 million in bonds that had to be sold to make the '64 Fair possible would be somewhere in the neighborhood of over $350 million today.

I applaud the energy and imagination that the Princeton students have exhibited. But my own feeling is that the reality of their dream will remain just that ... a dream. I don't think that in these economic times and at this point in the history of New York City when its major priority is rebuilding the Downtown area, there is any kind of support for a new World's Fair. After all, and I made this point back in 1964, New York City itself is a giant World's Fair. Superimposing a World's Fair upon a "World's Fair" is somewhat redundant.

I have very positive memories of the NYWF. Just two questions: I remember reading that representatives from Montreal's Expo67 visited the NYWF. Their goal, I believe, was to gain information and ideas of what worked in New York and what was not quite so successful. I believe they hoped to gain valuable insights as to how to create a positive environment for Expo by viewing New York's fair at the peak of its operation. Do you recall these visits by Expo representatives and if so, what ideas did they take with them after spending time in Flushing Meadow? Secondly, I loved virtually everything I saw at the NYWF. As a professional who had to market the Fair, however, what was the most challenging part of your task and what, if anything, about the Fair would you have changed? Thank you for taking your time to share your ideas with us. I certainly appreciate reading your thoughts. - Jim

GREG DAWSON: Yes, the Expo people did come to the Fair to do all you outline in your question. What they took back with them I'm really not certain. But we did much the same thing with Seattle. I went to Seattle to look over what their operation was like and even traveled up to the top of the unfinished Space Needle. Others from our Fair went out there to look over their operation. Their Fair was, of course, before ours opened.

I know that one thing the Expo people were interested in was licensing and I believe that they spent some time with Martin Stone and his licensing operation. Following the close of our Fair I was retained as a consultant by both HemisFair in San Antonio and by Expo67 in Montreal. Most of my work for them consisted in helping them structure ticket packages and help with their advance ticket sales program.

What would I have changed about our Fair? Well had it been within my power, and it wasn't, I certainly would have wanted to change the relationship between Mr. Moses and the media. He was an enormously controversial person all his life and for most of it he had a kind of golden relationship with the press. But by the time of the Fair, he was fighting with the Press all the time, over Shakespeare in Central Park (and Joe Papp) and with Governor Nelson Rockefeller who wanted Moses to give up some of his power, and with just about everyone. The press had basically turned against him and, for the first time, began to criticize him. This in turn reflected badly on the Fair. Once we opened, the press went to town and it was primarily to get at Mr. Moses that they did so. The main thing they harped on was that we were not meeting our attendance projections. We weren't. Our projections were way too high made so by our need to show prospective investors that we would make a profit (something no World's Fair in the US has ever done and perhaps in the world). So our projections said we would have 70 million visitors and we in truth only had some 50 million. No small potatoes, to do that kind of admissions in only 12 months (over two years) of operation. Had Mr. Moses been on better terms with the media, I think we would have had a better break with the press.

  • How did you commute to NYWF?
  • Where, on-site, did you get the 'mornin' coffee and buttered roll?
  • Describe the layout within the Press Building? And your department? What cluttered your office?
  • The Press Building had Broadcast-Quality Radio and Television studios, were they used regularly? You Got Stories?
  • Describe for us the Model Room at the Administration Building? You Got Stories?
  • Describe, visually, RM's office?
    How regularly was Mr. Moses on site?
  • Did you meet "Mr. New York", Grover A. Whalen? He died while holding a 64/65 honorary position. '62? '63? - Park Bench

GREG DAWSON: For the first year of working for the Fair I would drive out from Manhattan with a friend of mine, Gates Davison, who became the Chief of Protocol for the Fair. Gates had a brand new Lincoln Continental convertible I remember, the first car that had a top that disappeared into a compartment that opened in the back. I was most impressed. Gates also had a great deal of money from his family. A terrific guy. Then, after I worked for the Fair for about six months, I bought my own convertible, considerably more conservative and cheaper! A Corvair. The day I bought it, however, the Fair assigned me a car (Olds) and driver who picked me up every morning and drove me home in the evening, or into Manhattan during the day if I had business there. Quite nice if you're 27.

Coffee in the morning? We got if from a cafeteria that was maintained in the Administration Building operated by Restaurant Associates. And quite good food, too. They also catered all our events and had many food concessions on the Fair grounds once we opened.

There was a large hallway in the Press Building when you entered and my office was to the immediate right of the lobby, in a corner. Quite nice. I also still had an office in the Administration Building which is where I spent most of my time. The Deegan and Donoghue people filled the space to the immediate right of the lobby, a large bull pen type of space with many desks and with private offices around it. We also had a large room for press conferences and meetings. Yes, there were studios, but they weren't so great and really weren't used all that much. I don't have any particular stories that I can remember about them.

My own office was decorated with sculptures that I made, and still do. In those days I was doing all sorts of fanciful masks and strange creatures and I remember that (very nicely) Bill Berns once asked me if perhaps I didn't have a few too many in the office. It seems that Mr. Moses had made a rare visit to our offices in the Administration Building and had, for some reason, wandered into my office and was a bit stunned by the display I had up. I never took anything down, however, and the world didn't collapse. I was somewhat of an iconoclast while at the Fair.

The Model Room was a very large room with the model of the Fair grounds smack in the middle and a walkway that went around it. In some parts of that walkway it became a ramp and you could actually look down at the Fair. The model was constantly changing from imaginary buildings (at first) to actual little models of the buildings that would eventually be built as architects submitted their plans. It was the responsibility of each individual exhibitor to pay Lester Associates (the model builders) to make a model of their building. Then it was placed on the model. Frequently I would take people to the model and give them a bit of a tour. Our most important visitor to the model room was JFK, in the spring of '63.

RM's office was in the extreme right-hand corner of the Administration Building as you faced it from the entrance. It was a large office with a giant desk but not too fancy. It was only one of his many offices. His main office was at the headquarters of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (which he also ran). But if memory serves me well he was at the Fair a great deal of the time and toward the opening of the Fair, all the time. Hard to know because he was often there or not there and no one knew it except his three secretaries. He also had three secretaries at the Triborough offices.

He had at least two limos with drivers at his disposal at all times. When he would arrive at the Fair he would have piles of papers with him that he would give his secretaries to work through, he having written dozens of memos and notes the night before while at home. He invented the word "workaholic" I believe. Our public relations offices were right across the hall from his suite of offices. And he often entertained people at lunch, served in his offices. I once attended such a lunch, with Rudy Valee. An embarrassing lunch, actually, because Mr. Valee and Mr. Moses were both terribly hard-of-hearing, and couldn't understand anything the other was saying and simply shouted at each other. I believe they had both been at Yale at the same time. But Mr. Moses thought Rudy was a horse's *** . He thought many people were horse's ***es and he was probably right.

I never met Mr. Whalen and have only a vague memory that he came out to the Fair at some point, but I'm not certain. He was, I believe, not in good health. But I don't believe I ever met him. Mr. Moses didn't think too highly of him either if I remember correctly. Whalen was basically a figurehead during the first Fair, in '39, primarily the "greeter" for the City and the City's Chief of Protocol.

How many Progress Reports were actually done? The covers say eleven, I believe, but someone told me there were only ten. Any idea how many copies of each you put out? - Mary Ellen

GREG DAWSON: I'd have to look at my copies. I have of all the Progress Reports actually bound together in blue leather. I was in charge of having five sets bound: for Mr. Moses, Bill Berns, probably for Tom Deegan, and two others. But I sneaked in six copies; one for myself. But it's in storage. If memory serves me, I would say probably ten is correct. I certainly don't remember eleven. As to the number of those printed and distributed I would guess perhaps 3,000. But I'm not at all certain. I just don't remember the exact number.

  • Were there three shelters by the WF Marina? I have seen renderings showing three and two exist there now. Just curious. Old photos show Johnson Marine in one & US Coast Guard in another.
  • Did the WF Corporation and Robert Moses consider Shea Stadium as part of the World's Fairgrounds? I know it shows up on the maps but the general consensus seems to be that Shea was rolled into the Fair for budgetary reasons only.
  • What was your worst public relations nightmare of the Fair? - Mary Ellen

GREG DAWSON: I really don't have the foggiest notion of how many shelters were at the Marina. I'm not even certain I was ever at the Marina!

In a way Shea Stadium was considered a part of the Fair, but not really. It was not under the jurisdiction of the Fair and we really didn't hold any major events there. It was just part of the whole area ... Flushing. I do remember that after the Beatles were there for their first US appearance, I think in 1963, we were asked if we wanted to have them the next year at the Fair. After Mr. Moses took one look at what they looked like and knew a bit about them he absolutely did not want them at the Fair. Perceptive, he was not all that!

Things like the "best" and the "worst" are not really answerable questions. It probably doesn't fit the category of your question but the "worst" public relations moment probably was in the fall of '64 (the end of the first year of the Fair) when Mr. Moses was forced, by Tom Deegan and the Executive Committee (which Deegan headed), to totally disband the Fair's Public Relations Department. That meant that everyone below Bill Berns was, in effect, fired, including me. It was a sad day for the Fair and, as it turned out in the long run, a sad day for Tom Deegan because I doubt that Mr. Moses spoke to him much after that. As it turned out [it was] a good day for me. I immediately formed my own Public Relations company, Gregory Dawson Inc., and staffed the company with those that worked for me at the Fair. We had all been given severance pay of a year's salary so we could work "free" until the firm caught on. I immediately got several Fair exhibitors as clients. Life works in mysterious ways. In a strange way I was more "involved" in the second year of the Fair, and better paid for it, than the first year. So perhaps that wasn't the worst public relations experience. I really don't have any other opinion on what might have been the Fair's worst public relations experience.

Greg, can you tell us more about Restaurant Associates? - Mike Kraus

GREG DAWSON: I can certainly tell you about Restaurant Associates which I will continue to refer to as RA throughout this. I was very close to the RA people at the Fair and beyond. They still exist and operate some very big restaurants in New York City as well as a very large and successful catering operation. But back in the late 50s and the early 60s they were perhaps the major restaurant operator in New York.

The man who ran RA was Joe Baum, probably the greatest restaurant "conceptualizer" who ever lived. Seriously. Although Joe didn't start RA, he took it from a company that was basically a coffee supplier to the major restaurant operator that it became. Yes, he created "Forum of the Twelve Ceasers, and the Four Seasons (the restaurant, not the hotel chain), and The Tower Suite, and the Zum Zum chain, and The Brasserie, and Fonda Del Sol and many others. Perhaps at their biggest there were seventeen major restaurants.

The "inside" connection to the Fair was, to a degree, this:

There was (and is) a restaurant in Central Park called Tavern on the Green. It was, pure and simply, a creation of Mr. Moses when he ruled the land -- especially all the parks in New York City and New York State. He wanted an alternative to a place called The Casino, a favorite place of the legendary mayor Jimmy Walker. The Casino in the Park, by the way, was where the famed Eddy Duchin and his orchestra performed back in the 20s.

Anyway, Mr. Moses wanted to have another restaurant in the park and got a man named Arthur Schlieffer to run it, to actually own it. The building itself was owned by New York City and Arthur leased it. It was an OK restaurant but nothing special other than it's great location. When the Fair came along Mr. Moses got Arthur Schlieffer to run the cafeteria operation in the Administration Building and also to cater all special events. And, at that time, Arthur sold Tavern on the Green to RA. So in effect, RA handled the cafeteria and did the parties that the Fair put on. Thus the kind of "inside" relationship.

When it came time to bid for the concession stands that sold fast food and souvenirs around the Fair site RA had to actually bid, and did. It ended up sharing all the stands with the other winner of the bidding process, the Brass Rail Restaurant chain. And then, in addition, RA bid on and won the restaurants that have been mentioned before: the Gas building, Ford, Indonesia, the Port Authority.

Joe Baum, who died about three years ago, was the man who really invented the whole concept of "theme" restaurants -- the idea that restaurants are indeed theater and that people go to them as much for the experience, the decor, the concept, as they do for the food. And as such he influenced restaurants all over America and, indeed, the world.

After the Fair, when I had my own public relations company, I handled public relations for some of those restaurants .... Fonda Del Sol, the Paul Revere, the Four Seasons. And then, many years later in the early 90s, I produced nine musical revues for Joe Baum at a place called Rainbow & Stars, a part of the Rainbow Room (atop the GE building), a restaurant that Joe recreated and owned. He also created the famed restaurant, Windows on the World at the top of the World Trade Center. The Rainbow Room and Windows came after he left RA. As a consultant he created many restaurants around the world.

So Brass Rail and Restaurant Associates operated the concession stands together? And off-topic: Were there actually 2 iterations of the Rainbow Room? - Mike Kraus

GREG DAWSON: I should have been a bit clearer. The Brass Rail and RA ran separate concession stands, not together. They each had half of the stands. I'm not certain who designed those bubbles but I don't think it was any Fair person.

The original Rainbow Room goes back to the 30's when the (then RCA, now GE) building was built. Much art deco design and, if I'm not mistaken, I think Donald Desky was the designer -- one of the great designers of the period. The RCA building was, I believe, designed by Wallace Harrison, a great friend of Mr. Moses who had some input in the '64 Fair. He certainly was involved in designs at the '39 Fair.

Anyway, the Rainbow Room was always really "owned" by the Rockefeller Center people who owned the building. Over the years various operators were involved and in the 70s and early 80s it got very seedy and kind of run down and not too successful. Only the daytime private club, for lunch, was a success because most of the top executives in the RCA building were members. In the mid 80s the Rockefeller Center people, including David Rockefeller who headed the organization at that time, came to Joe Baum and asked him to
take over the operation of the place. He agreed provided they would put up what turned out to be some $20 million to spruce the place up. They agreed and gave him a ten year lease and he closed the place and spent two years on a spectacular recreation, moving some of the spaces around, hiring the architect Hugh Hardy to redesign the place, but keeping the feel and the look of the original. It was truly
wonderful and became enormously successful, including the installation of a cabaret/nightclub space within the whole Rainbow Room complex which was called Rainbow & Stars where major performers were presented and where, for three years, I produced a series of wonderful revues saluting major Broadway songwriters. And it was a small room, with a great view -- one whole glass wall with New York as the backdrop.

When Joe's lease was up, I think in 1996, the RCA (now GE) building was under different management, Rockefeller Center having been sold to a consortium of people including some Japanese. And Joe was out and the Harry Cipriani people took over (of the famed Harry's Bar in Rome and other restaurants in New York). They have turned it into a private club, primarily, and it's open to the public only one or two days a week and for private parties. Joe Baum died in '98. And that's the Rainbow story.

Greg, Please tell us the Singer Bowl story - Mike Kraus

GREG DAWSON: At some point in '63 Mr. Moses decided that the Fair should have a stadium, a place for the official opening of the Fair and also a place where certain major events and shows could be put on, preferably free, to the public so that people coming to the Fair wouldn't think that everything inside the Fair cost money. He was also thinking about what types of things could be left after the Fair as a kind of legacy for Flushing Meadow Park which was much dearer to his heart than the very temporary Fair.

But he wanted someone else to pay for it. So he agreed to call it after any company that would pay the money to build it. That was not as common a practice as it is today, naming a quasi-public structure after a corporation, and there was some controversy over the concept. Shea stadium was named after Bill Shea, a New York lawyer who was instrumental in getting the city to build it, but not a corporation. And Yankee Stadium was named after the team that played there. Stadiums were normally named after human beings or after teams, with the notable exception of Wrigley Field in Chicago.

Ted Royal was the account executive at J. Walter Thompson, the ad agency on the Fair account (and later became my partner in my public relations firm after the Fair). He had a few other accounts, including the Singer Company. So one day Ted said to me , "Greg, you and I are going to sell Singer on paying for that stadium." which surprised me a bit. But it sounded interesting so I agreed. And we did. We met with the head people from Singer one afternoon in the Thompson offices and we were really terrific, I say modestly. We sold them on the idea and they did pay for it and it became Singer Bowl. That was the name that stayed with it for a few years after the Fair. But when the US Tennis Association took over, out went Singer. As a matter of fact, Singer no longer exists either, in name or otherwise. I guess they had their 15 minutes of fame.

The Bowl was a very useful facility during the Fair and of course it was the place where the official opening ceremonies took place complete with LBJ and complete with the Congress Of Racial Equality picketing outside. And it rained. Quite a day.

Were there any pavilions which surprised you with their popularity or lack of same? - runbill

GREG DAWSON: On looking back I can't think of a particular exhibit that surprised me with its popularity or lack thereof. For the most part the great exhibits were really great and the dogs were the dogs. The worst exhibits included the so-called Hollywood pavilion and the Better Living pavilion. Maybe the biggest surprise was the success of the Johnson Wax pavilion because it was so simple ... basically just a movie. But it was a great exhibit. GE and Ford and Pepsi had the Disney touch so the success of those was a foregone conclusion long before we opened. IBM was kind of a surprise but it's building was spectacular and that was it's main attraction. I personally loved the Belgian Village. The New York State pavilion was kind of a surprise hit because of its 360 degree movie screen which I think was a "first." The RCA pavilion was a hit because it was an on-going active TV station all day long, albeit closed circuit to the Fair grounds. And DuPont, again primarily a movie, was a big hit because it combined motion picture with live action with the actors "coming off" the screen. Very clever. And although it wasn't an exhibit as such, one of the great highlights of the Fair, for me, was the nightly display of the dancing fountains and fireworks. The Fair at night was a really beautiful place to be! To have dinner at the Fair and then stroll around when it was less crowded and see the people having a really good time. Well now that I'm thinking about it I kind of miss it a bit.

One of NBC's most popular TV shows at the time of the Fair was The Jonathan Winters Show each Saturday on NBC-TV. Can you recollect the day Robert Moses ejected Jonathan Winters and the entire NBC-TV film crew from the Fairgrounds? - Ray in Pasadena

GREG DAWSON: I am vaguely aware of the incident but we had several hundred shows that originated at the Fair and this one did not particularly stand out in my memory. It was probably handled by John O'Keefe who was in charge of the radio-TV section of our activities. John later went on to a very distinguished career as head of marketing for Lincoln Center in New York and I believe is now retired. Very good man.

Anyway, if other incidents similar to the one you describe happened, this is what I think actually happened. The producers of the Winters show, I would bet, did not go through proper channels in setting up arrangements and could have simply assumed that they could do anything they wanted on the Fairgrounds and just came out. Or perhaps there was an internal communication flub between our radio-TV department and the Operations Department of the Fair which was run by a really horrible character named Stuart Constable. Constable hated the public. He had been Mr. Moses' right hand man for the New York City Parks Department and literally ran the Parks Department for Mr. Moses prior to the Fair. He was really the wrong man to be in charge of anything that had to do with the public and relating to the public. And, unless every "i was dotted and t was crossed" when one was setting up an "event" such as a TV show filming on the Fair site, Constable, out of a kind of perversity, would probably screw it up. I doubt frankly that Mr. Moses even knew who Jonathan Winters was. But the story of "Moses kicking out Winters" was probably something the press enjoyed and built up, as they did many stories about Mr. Moses that either never happened or could have been attributed to someone else.

I remember vividly one incident that Mr. Moses actually did get involved in because it involved me. A press agent, Michael Goldstein, thought it would be a smart idea if he had a client of his, a pretty starlet, take off her shoes and wade into the reflecting pool at the Fair. He had a photographer ready, naturally, and he pulled it off then released the photo to the press which liked it and ran it. Mr. Moses was furious. So RM sent me a memo to "have that press jerk" barred forever from the Fair, something I really didn't know how to accomplish. We had many gates and if you had a ticket, you got in. And Mike got in many times after that. He also became, after the Fair, a good friend of mine, and remains so to this day.

I've noticed on many items with a Fair Corporation copyright notice that there are multiple copyright dates preceding the notice. For example:
C 1961,1962,1963 New York World's Fair 1964-65 Corporation. Why is that? - Mike Kraus

GREG DAWSON: I can't remember that this was something put on Fair produced materials but it might have been. I'm not a lawyer but I would imagine that the years preceding the line "New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Corporation" were the actual year of the beginning of the copyright. Obviously the years in the phrase New York World's Fair ... the 1964-1965 bit ... were part of the official corporation name. The prior years mentioned, the 1961,1962, etc., indicated the specific years that the particular copyright applied to the particular material copyrighted. Meaning of course, the copyright of the logo and the Unisphere. I don't have any easy answer for you but it would seem to me that it was legalese to super protect the property rights of the Fair primarily for the protection of the licensees who had spent a hell of a lot of money for certain rights. That was the prime guiding principle behind any and all the copyright protection. There really was no other need for any protection except to protect, for the time of the Fair, the money making deals with licensees.

In my opinion, getting the Pieta to the Fair was one of its most impressive achievements. Did Robert Moses negotiate directly with the Vatican to arrange this? - Gene

GREG DAWSON: I would agree that the Pieta was an incredible achievement, getting it to the Fair. Actually I think bringing the Pieta over was an idea that originated in the Vatican once the Vatican agreed to participate in the Fair. And getting the Vatican to do that was the work of Tom Deegan who served as chairman of the Executive Committee of the Fair and was the man who originated the whole idea of the Fair and got Moses to become the Fair's president. Deegan was a very big Catholic, a Knight of Malta, raised a great deal of money for the Church and probably had his eyes on the idea of becoming Ambassador to the Vatican some day, which never happened. So he was able to persuade them to participate in the Fair and the Pieta was the result. And what a great exhibit it was too! I remember vividly the groundbreaking ceremony we held for the Vatican pavilion which took place at about 5 AM because it was worked out that the Pope, in Rome, would press a button to start the motor of the backhoe that turned the first shovel to break the ground. Under a tent. I think that Mr. Moses was proudest of having the Pieta at the Fair.

  • Part of Disney lore is that [Disney] wanted to buy the NYWF at its conclusion and make it a permanent theme park. His advisors were against it and steered him toward implementing the concept in Florida, now of course Disney World. Were you aware of any serious attempt by Walt Disney to buy the Fair?
  • I read in R. Moses autobiography "Public Works: A Dangerous Trade" that H.L. Hunt, the Texas oil baron, proposed to build an elaborate amusement area at the Fair but instead became merely a nuisance to the Fair people. What was the story with Hunt? - Gene

GREG DAWSON: Mr. Moses wanted to have "entertainment" at the Fair, not just corporate and international exhibits, but some rides and other things that would require paid admissions and he wanted entrepreneurs to come in, pay a rent and a percentage and put up these activities. But he also wanted them to be of quality. To be special, not like a county fair. For some reason this idea appealed to H.L. Hunt, the Texas billionaire oil man. So he came to see Mr. Moses and RM told him his idea of creating a section of the Fair patterned after something RM had seen in Denmark and loved, the Tivoli Gardens with elegant landscaping, classy rides, little places to eat, etc. Hunt thought that was great and with a great flash of publicity including, I believe, a front page picture in the New York Times, Hunt presented a one million dollar check to RM --the largest single check anyone had shelled out to do something at the Fair. Remember, that would be like handing over a check for $10 million today.

For the next few months Hunt would come out to the Fair almost daily. He would prowl the halls of the Administration Building handing out mimeographed leaflets propounding his very conservative, rightist,
redneck philosophy to any and all Fair employees. He was notoriously cheap and would come to the Fair by subway bringing his lunch in a brown bag. Seriously. It was kind of a joke. One day he came into my
office with a young early twenties fellow in tow and said "Mr. Dawson, I want you to meet my son, Roy." And the two of them sat down, opened their lunch bags and began to eat and talk. Actually, Mr. Hunt did all the talking. He would say things like: "Roy. Tell Mr. Dawson here about that oil well I gave you for your 18th birthday, because I thought it was all dried up. Ha ha. And then it came in a gusher! Ha, ha." And so forth. Quite bizarre. I was a bit intimidated, I have to admit, and just really sat there and listened. Then they got up and left.

About two days later, unbeknownst to the whole Public Relations Department, there appeared another front page story in the papers: "H.L. Hunt Kicked Out Of Fair."

It turned out that Mr. Moses had received the final working plans for the layout and operation of the Hunt Tivoli Gardens project and was horrified. No landscaping. Cheap rides. Totally unlike anything he had
anticipated. So with characteristic Moses' flourish, RM had a Fair check drawn for one million dollars and returned to Hunt who was quoted as saying that no one had ever returned a million dollars to him.

You also wanted to know about Disney wanting to buy the Fair. I don't know if he did or not, but I doubt it. For one thing, the Disney people had always shied away from doing anything in the New York area because of the weather. They didn't want to build any parks where they couldn't operate year round. There had been a big amusement park tried in the Bronx and it was a huge failure. Yes, there's a park in New Jersey, Great Adventure, but it's only open six or so months of the year and that's not the kind of operation that Disney liked.

The other reason that I doubt that Disney even contemplated "buying" the Fair is because he would have, should have, known that it would be impossible. The City of New York would never sell him that space or even lease it to him. Mr. Moses would have opposed it flat out. I doubt that Moses would have even entertained a conversation on the subject. And he liked Disney; respected him. I'm sure the story is apocryphal.

A question was asked regarding whether Mr. Dawson remembered the roles of Robert Koppel and Charles Prucie in the Fair and why they disappeared so early in the Fair's planning. He was also asked if he remembered Bruce Nicholson who had written a book about his Fair Corporation experiences titled "Hi Ho Come to the Fair!"

GREG DAWSON: Well, you certainly brought back some memories!
I vaguely remember Koppel and what you say I think is very accurate. He probably was related to the Rockefellers and he must have faded early from the picture.

Charles or Charlie Prucie (and I too am unsure of the spelling) was involved in the Fair in the early stages. He was a big corporate lawyer type and Mr. Moses made him the original Vice President in charge of
the Industrial Section getting corporations to come to the Fair. But he was an utter failure at the job and really couldn't pull it off so RM fired him and made Martin Stone, who was in charge of Fair licensing, also VP for getting the corporations into the Fair. He did a bang up job. I don't know if Martin is still alive, he would be in his 90s if he were, but he was a wonderful man. I really liked him. A real gentleman. And very bright. Prucie was kind of a jerk. But then, we had our fair share of such people.

I didn't know that Bruce had written a book, which is interesting information, and I would love to know where I could find it. I never heard of it. Bruce Nicholson was also a friend of mine and he was indeed a good friend of Gates Davison. But he wasn't 27. I think Bruce must have been in his mid-thirties as was Gates. Bruce was, as you say, involved in the International Section of the Fair and I think he went on some of the overseas trips to get countries involved. Governor Poletti, who I believe might still be alive and close to 100, was in charge of that end of the Fair.

Just for informational purposes there were five Vice Presidents of the Fair. General Potter, the Executive VP also in charge of getting the States into the Fair; Governor Poletti in charge of the International Section of the Fair; Martin Stone in charge of the Industrial Section; Stuart Constable, the VP of Operations; and Bill Berns, VP of Communications and Public Relations. Erwin Witt was the Comptroller.Judge Maguire was in charge of Labor Relations. General Meyers in charge of Security. My god, I'm surprised I'm remembering all these names and people. Gates was chief of protocol.

This whole trip down memory lane has been fun. I've enjoyed it.

Mr. Dawson was asked if he had a favorite spot where he could "get away." He was also asked to describe the Administration Building, where were the discos at the Fair and if he visits the Park today and what his impressions are of it now.

GREG DAWSON: Let me think about a favorite spot. If I wanted to "get away" I simply went to my office I think. One spot I really liked was the Belgian Village which looked like a really spectacular movie set. There was a restaurant in the Village where a group of us would often go to at night. Also, during the first year of the Fair, the Indonesian Pavilion was spectacular and the food was terrific. George Lang, who worked for Restaurant Associates at that time and was in charge of all their Fair operations (which included the American Gas Pavilion
and the Ford Pavilion's private dining room) spent almost a year in Indonesia before the Fair planning the dining facility for that exhibit. And it paid off. The food was great and each night there was a terrific show. It was a large round dining room. Quite beautiful. Today George Lang is one of the top restaurant consultants in the country and owner of a great New York Restaurant, Cafe des Artistes. He also has one of the great restaurants in Budapest, the name of which escapes me.

The Administration Building ... Well the best way to describe where it is: if you were facing the Fair grounds from the Grand Central Parkway (which cut through the Fair site, with the Transportation section on one side and the rest of the Fair on the other) it would be in the extreme left corner, actually a few hundred feet from one of the Fair entrances It was outside the actual Fair grounds. I don't know any better way to describe it to you but if you are familiar with the Fair layout you should be able to place it. I'm certain the building is still there so if you are around Flushing Meadow Park you should look it up.

Discos and nightclubs? Well, discos weren't invented yet. They didn't come along until the end of the 60s. The only nightclub type of thing I can remember is the Texas Pavilion which was really a show more
than a nightclub. I mentioned Indonesia and the Belgian Village which really didn't have a show until one night when George Lang and a group of us from the Fair staff gathered there for dinner. Afterward George produced a violin and played "Gloomy Sunday." The Fair at night was beautiful with fireworks and the great fountain display and great restaurants. But late night nightclubbing was not too much part of the scene.

Of course I have passed by Flushing Meadow frequently when on the Long Island Expressway or the Grand Central Expressway and you can see the remains of the New York State building, and the [Port Authority] Building and the City Building (from the '39 Fair) and the Amphitheater. The last time I was actually on the Fair grounds was a few years ago when I went out to the U.S. Open tennis matches and there was (and still is I believe) parking in Flushing Meadow. I drove around a bit to see what there was to see. Not much. Just a park these days. For years the U.S. Open was played in what was originally Singer Bowl, a major Fair facility that was built specifically for the Fair. I helped sell Singer Sewing Machine Company on financing the building of the Bowl, but that's another story. Now, of course, the Tennis group has built a new facility and many more and it's a real installation out there.

A question was asked regarding rumors that plans had existed to keep the Fair operating after 1965

GREG DAWSON: I think that as it does with all weighty questions, such as yours, regarding the Fair it boils down to the nature of the beast; in this case the beast being Mr. Moses. More than anything else, the Fair was a corporate projection of the man and everything about it was a reflection of his interests, his goals, his motives.

Mr. Moses most definitely did not want the Fair to be a "lasting" thing and he was adamant that the buildings being built would be temporary structures. For one thing, by being temporary buildings, the City's very tough building code could be circumvented somewhat making it much easier and quicker to get building permits and get the Fair built. Also, the structures could be built at far less cost, another attractive element in getting exhibitors into the Fair.

But more than anything, Mr. Moses wanted to create a great PARK. You have to realize that New York City has plenty of buildings, plenty of structures, plenty of museums, plenty of physical public amenities. But
to Mr. Moses, and many others, there could never be enough green space.

During his tenure as Parks Commissioner for both the City and the State he enlarged the public park areas by an enormous amount. He also invented something new in public planning, the parkways, highways that were, in effect, parks as well as major expressways. And this was adopted throughout the whole country by other cities and states. He was, in its truest form, a Master Planner and Builder.

His whole reason for building the Fair was to provide a reason and money to build the extremely complex road system that surrounds the Fair and to finish that which he had started with the '39 Fair: a green belt down the center of Long Island.

So, no. I never heard of any ideas for things to remain after the Fair. Quite the opposite. And I am amazed that the New York State Pavilion still stands. It was very much a temporary building but it's still
there. And there is the [Port Authority] Building still standing and the Singer Bowl, which is now part of the US Tennis Association's Flushing Meadow presence. And the Unisphere still stands. I think he was happy that it remained. But other buildings? No. The Fair was a moment in time, not a lasting institution except in memory.

Mr. Dawson was asked a question about H.L Hunt building the Texas Pavilion

GREG DAWSON: Sorry to correct you, but H.L. Hunt did not build the Texas Music Hall. When Moses threw him out he threw him out and, to my knowledge, had nothing more to do with him.

I believe you are confusing the Hunt family with the Wynne family, father Angus and son Gordon, who did indeed build the Texas Music Hall and went bankrupt for their trouble. They also owned Six Flags Over Texas which was a very successful venture. The story of the Wynnes and the Fair has been told many times so I won't go into it now. I knew both father and son and they were nice people. But when they came to the Fair and New York they were [in] just a bit over their heads and didn't really know the territory. The show they produced, "From Broadway With Love," was somewhat of a mess and the people coming to the Fair really didn't want to pay for a Broadway ticket after they had paid to enter the Fair grounds. And they didn't, in droves. Kind of a sad Fair story.

A question was asked about how Press Releases were handled and other questions regarding the operations at the Press Building

GREG DAWSON: Press releases were generally handled by the Donoghue office, the firm that was in charge of day-in-day-out press relations. They worked for my department but they were the ones that sent out the releases. The Fair itself didn't send out releases. Of course all the exhibitors at the Fair had their own PR departments and sent out their own press releases dealing with activities specific to their own endeavors.

Once the Fair opened and there was a Press Building, all major news outlets had representatives at the Fair full time, including the three press services: AP, UP and INS. UPI had not as yet been formed. It was the union of United Press and International News Service. They all had photo people at the Fair as did the major New York City newspapers, full time. Each newspaper, by the way, had a full time
reporter assigned to the Fair. So they did indeed get their own stories daily. And, of course, took some tips from our PR firms and staff.

As to your techno remarks, we weren't all that backwards. Photos were often sent to media outlets by wire. It wasn't that primitive! Hey, although we used carbons and made that (strange to think of it now) thing called "carbon copies," we also had Xerox copy machines. Admittedly, they were quite new in "those days," but we did have them.

Mr. Dawson was asked abut the memorabilia he has from the Fair

GREG DAWSON: I have bits and pieces. Quite a few memos, my Fair pass, some other things. And about six bronze Fair medals. Unfortunately, as I related in the interview, I had quite a few other things, like the Lili Rethi drawings of the Fair in construction and originals of some of our Fair posters. But through a weird set of circumstances they ended up in the collection of Larry Zimm and when he died I believe they went to the Smithsonian. Which is probably just as well.

I'm kind of fascinated to have learned that there was this pocket of Fair enthusiasts somewhere "out there" and I must confess that 40 years ago I never even contemplated that such a group would exist down the line. But I think it's fun and applaud the dedicated interest that you all seem to have.

Yes, Bill [Young] told me about the Park adventure [Flushing Meadow get-together with enthusiasts in 2001] and I believe Mike Pender spoke last year. I would certainly consider it if asked but I'm not certain how much new stuff I could offer after that rather extensive interview and all these questions. But it might be fun.

Here's a second reply to your question about some of the stuff that I have. I just did a bit of going through some files and came up with "New York World's Fair 1964-1965 Radio & Television Information Kit" which we sent out to every radio and TV station in the country and contains a copy of a speech by Mr. Moses delivered at Yale University on March 13, 1963, called "The Anatomy of A Fair"; a copy of the Official Preview Book of the Fair put out by Time/Life with a cover by Whitney Darrow, Jr. and with many drawings inside by Darrow as well, something I don't think had wide circulation except to media people;a copy of Newsweek magazine's preview of the Fair with a Robert Moses cover; a World's Fair poster (the red one); a hotel guide that gave prices for all hotels in New York City for the Fair years (most rooms, it seems, were in the $5, $6 and $7 range, although the Plaza had rates of from $15 -25); a schedule of Olympic trials; a Fair fact sheet; and other stuff. I also found the printed copy of the Fair Magazine Report, which reprinted all the magazine stories that appeared about the Fair from April of '61 to June of '64, compiled by the Donoghue operation. That was basically an internal distribution and perhaps sent to all the exhibitors as well. Oh, yes. I found some copies of the complete six weeks adventures of Poteet Canyon, the niece of the comic strip character "Steve Canyon," which was the creation of cartoonist Milton Caniff. He had Poteet working at the Fair as a Press Aide, working for her boss, Dawson Gregg. The Fair did the whole series up as a booklet which we printed and, again, it was a
limited distribution. And I found a copy of Life Magazine which has the Fair on the cover and a complete story inside about the Fair. Dated May 1, 1964, right after we opened. Quite a spread.

Mr. Dawson was asked if he had any knowledge as to why the State of Pennsylvania ended up in a pavilion in front of the Pool of Industry, if he had any comments on the Quaker Oats exhibit and if he had any knowledge of some of the more spectacular flops of the Fair -- mainly World of Food and Better Living Pavilions.

GREG DAWSON: I have no specific knowledge of why Pennsylvania came in so late. Frankly I wasn't all that aware that they did. But I would imagine the problem was one that many of the States had: getting authorization and financial support from their legislatures. General Potter, who was the Executive Vice President of the Fair, was put in charge of getting the States in the Fair and he did a great job against difficult odds. He had to persuade Governors who in turn had to persuade their Assembly people. And they had to raise money, often from local industries, and all the political stuff that you can imagine made the task extremely difficult. In the three years leading up to the Fair there were local elections, state offices changed, legislators changed, etc. So if Pennsylvania was late that's probably the reason. And that was probably also the reason that the state ended up in the Industrial Area. The State Area was probably filled up. That's the only reason I can think of.

I vaguely remember Quaker Oats, but really don't know any of the details about it.

World of Food was put together badly, I think, by a promoter, as was the House of Good Taste, the Better Living Pavilion, and Hollywood, USA. All were pretty much messes. But they probably added some color to the Fair as a whole. I have no memory of Camp Cayuca. What was it? Do you know? And I remember that there was an American Indian Exhibit which I think consisted of a large teepee. But I'm not at all certain. These were not standout exhibits, not ones that created a lasting memory and certainly not ones that created a memory in my mind!

A question was asked regarding "I Love Lucy" Day and Babylon, NY Day and what went in to creating "Special Days" events at the Fair

GREG DAWSON: Actually, the whole business of special "days" at the Fair was a big issue prior to opening and we spent a great deal of time on just exactly how we were going to deal with this. We were aware that the '39 Fair had gone pretty "days" wild and that they published the daily listing you mentioned and, frankly, we didn't want to get all that bogged down in such an effort. We knew that special days would happen and, as with many other things at the Fair, our policy was just that -- special days honoring towns and such were pretty much left to those that wanted to plan and promote them. When it was appropriate to provide Fair Corporation assistance, we did.

However, we did plan special special days and we had an active program promoting celebrity visits to the Fair including a white Cadillac convertible that we drove said celebrities around in on "their day". I well remember when Lucille Ball came out and many others. The convertible, by the way, was the only automobile allowed on the
Fair site. The only other mode of transportation were the Fair "trains"
that went around taking visitors to places and then a few of us had golf carts. But that became kind of political internally within the administration because so few of us were allowed to have these golf carts and it created great enmity. So soon after I was assigned one I gave it up.

We also worked with the State and national exhibitors when they wanted to have their special day at the Fair. So, yes. We did originate a great many special events and "days" but left all of the smaller ones like Babylon, Long Island Day to others. Except, perhaps, we might have helped Babylon, come to think of it, since that's where Mr. Moses had his house as well as an apartment in Manhattan.

A question was asked regarding Universal Studio's role in the Hollywood USA pavilion, if any

GREG DAWSON: As far as I can remember, Universal had nothing to do with the Hollywood pavilion but I wouldn't bet my life on it. I'm surprised if they put any of the Hollywood USA stuff into Universal's theme park because it was all such **** . But maybe. Or maybe that kind of thing, bad reenactments of movie scenes, monsters, wax works, props, were the way Universal got it's theme park started. It became a great theme park, eventually, but in the beginning it was just a poor man's Disneyland.

Mr. Dawson was asked about the type of work his firm was able to get as a result of his association with the Fair

GREG DAWSON: Most of the work my firm did during the second year of the Fair for exhibitors that we became involved with was the result of my relationship, still good and solid, with those that remained at the Fair. They were "troubled" exhibitors who really didn't have good relationships with the Fair management which is why I was of value to them. We sent out some press releases and staged some publicity events. But for the most part we ran interference for them with the Fair itself. Chief among these was the Hollywood USA Pavilion which was, frankly, a mess. Originally put together by former California Senator (and actor) George Murphy, the promoters of this operation put together a shoddy wax museum, for the most part, and threw in periodic gun fights from the OK Corral. And they charged admission to see all these wonders. They also fell behind on monies owed the Fair and stuff like that. I really was not happy representing them but all's Fair in love and building a company, I guess.

Anyway, my major involvement with Fair exhibitors was with the tours for Sinclair, Clairol and DuPont after the Fair. I did not handle work for them when the Fair was still on.

Yes, there was an Exhibitors Committee, made up of the public relations and advertising people from all the industrial exhibitors at the Fair and they met quite frequently and we met with them. There was no effort to coordinate advertising except that we did supply some art work, layouts of the Fair, and some props for various exhibits or special events that these companies individually wanted. We worked closely with them but it was an entirely cooperative relationship. And the Fair really didn't make any demands except that certain things, like our Graphic Standards and our copyrights, had to be observed when they used our logo or depictions of the Unisphere. Every time the Unisphere was shown, as our logo or in a picture or drawing, the words "Unisphere Presented by USS United States Steel" had to be prominently displayed near it by our agreement with US Steel. We also had to include our copyright line. It pissed off a great many people, including exhibitors, but that was the agreement that Mr. Moses had made.

Dear Mr. Dawson,
I represent the Acme Time Machine Company, and it is our pleasure to offer you a free introductory Time Travel Adventure, courtesy of Acme Time Machines. Mr. William Young (one of our many satisfied customers) has recommended you, and suggested a date of June 22, 1964, location north side of General Motors pavilion in Flushing Meadow, NY. You will have exactly 5 minutes, which Mr. Young suggests you might use to address the crowd, as you will be a visitor from the Future that these Fairgoers are dreaming about. - Bradd Schiffman

GREG DAWSON: I would probably say something like: Tout ca change, tout c'est la meme chose....the more things change the more they stay the same.

Because in truth, with minor adjustments due to advances in technology, the world of "tomorrow" is very much the same as the one we're now living in (1964). God knows the Middle East is the same. And so is much of the rest of the world with some slight shifting back and forth of international alliances. The problems we face, both as a nation and as little people occupying some time on a large planet, are the same.

The '39 Fair presented a preposterous proposition, "The World of Tomorrow," and then proceeded to predict and present with such exhibits as GM's Futurama and Democracity in the Perisphere. Most of those "predictions," as presented, never happened. Wisely, I think, the '64 Fair didn't even attempt to do much crystal ball gazing, with the exception of ATT's video phones (which although quite feasible, never caught on). As an entertainment, which was really it's primary purpose, I think the Fair did an astonishing job. Like any gigantic enterprise, within it were hits and misses. But the hits far outdistanced the misses. And it was one hell of a bargain. A $2 admission charge and once inside most shows were free. Compare that to Disneyland today where you have to pay $100 for the day, adult or child, and it doesn't matter what time of day you go there.

When you really think about it, the failures of the Fair were primarily monetary and I don't think the general public really gives a damn about such things. The fact that some banks --and it was primarily
banks -- bought some Fair bonds that they lost money on really doesn't matter all that much to Mr. and Mrs. Jones and their kids from Springfield, IL.

There were many controversies about the Fair: the argument over whether there should be an overall design concept with the Fair dictating what the buildings should look like, what the symbol of the Fair should be, should Mr. Moses have kissed the behind of the Bureau of International Exhibitions, whether the Fair should have built a great art museum (when New York City has the Museum of Modern Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art and about 50 other high quality museums!), should the Fair bring great international musical and
theatrical groups over (when Lincoln Center was being built and would be ready for the Fair and had a very extensive program of great productions), etc. But when all was said and done, the remarkable thing is, the Fair got built! It was a billion dollar project, the first of its size anywhere in the world, and it attracted more people than ever had gone to any single event in history and I believe it still holds that record.

I would sum up my little talk to that crowd I am going to see on June 22nd (I have just cleared my calendar, by the way) by telling them that 38 years from now they will be very glad they went to the Fair!

More Content